St. Croix 360

River stories to inspire stewardship.

  • Share News
  • Event Calendar
  • About
    • Contact
    • Subscribe
  • Support

Wisconsin law would limit local control of large factory farms

Legislators seek to give state agency the power to decide where new livestock facilities are located.

By Greg Seitz | February 14, 2020 | 3 minute read

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Print
  • More
  • LinkedIn
  • Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • Telegram
Wisconsin State Capitol, south face (Public domain)

A bill quickly making its way through the Wisconsin legislature would take away the authority of local officials to approve or reject proposals for large new livestock operations in their towns, cities, and counties.

Such confined animal feeding operations (CAFOs) do not resemble traditional farms, and are actually believed to be responsible for low prices and excess supply of milk and other products that are driving many Wisconsin farmers out of business.

There are only a few operating CAFOs in the parts of Wisconsin that drain to the St. Croix River, so far. More are proposed in the region, worrying neighbors and environmental advocates.

At a dairy cow CAFO near Baldwin last November, thousands of gallons of manure flowed off a field and into a designated trout stream, killing fish in the tributary of the Willow River.

Two counties and some municipalities in the region have enacted moratoriums while they study zoning laws and other regulations they can use to protect themselves.

Manure-laden water flowing through Hutton Creek in the St. Croix River watershed, Nov. 2019 (Wisconsin DNR photo)

AB894/SB808 would essentially take away any remaining power by such local boards to decide on CAFO applications. It would also limit public input on where and how such large-scale livestock production facilities could operate.

The new legislation was first introduced by a group of Republicans on Monday, with a hearing already yesterday.

“The expedited process associated with this bill is preventing meaningful review, discussion and comments from the public and interested parties,” said Adam Voskuil of the Midwest Environmental Advocates (MEA). “Since this hearing was announced, MEA has been inundated with citizen comments and concerns regarding the process and substance of this legislation.”

At the hearing yesterday, another MEA staffer, a former Wisconsin farmer, told the committee that the bill would actually hurt small farmers at the expense of big industrial agriculture companies.

She told the story of a farmer friend who now lived next to a 6,000-head dairy CAFO, and had to flee her home with her children when manure gasses made it dangerous to stay.

“I strongly disagree with attempts to frame this as a conversation that puts farmers on one side and everybody else on the other,” Peg Sheaffer of MEA testified. “The organizations that were given the opportunity to weigh in—the Dairy Business Association, the Dairy Alliance and others—represent only a small subset of farmers—those with enough money and power to have full time lobbyists at the capitol.”

The proposed legislation would:

  • Cap fees that local governments can charge to review CAFO applications.
  • Block local officials from enacting standards that are more stringent than what the state requires.
  • Prohibit local governments from requiring a financial “damage deposit” to pay for remediation if a company goes bankrupt or otherwise abandons manure lagoons and other facilities.
  • Create a new technical review board with a majority of the seats reserved for representatives of industrial agriculture, and require a two-thirds vote of the new board for any future revisions to the Livestock Facility Siting Law.
  • Give this board the power to overturn DATCP decisions on CAFO applications, letting a group controlled by industrial agriculture have the final authority.
  • Eliminate the process for reviewing and updating the state’s Livestock Facility Siting Law, which is currently required to take place every four years.
  • Ignore 30 months of work and input from the public on the most recent Livestock Siting Rule review and revisions.

It would also force the state’s Department of Agriculture, Trade, and Consumer Protections to oversee the entire application process, without any funding to pay staff to do the work.

“We do not have the position and work power required to begin to administer this program,” Angela James, assistant deputy secretary at DATCP, told the committee yesterday, according to Wisconsin Public Radio.

The Wisconsin Assembly is planning to adjourn for the year on Feb. 20, with the Senate working until sometime in March.

People with comments or concerns on the legislation are encouraged to contact their state elected officials. Find contact information on MyVote Wisconsin, provided by the Wisconsin Elections Commission. Contact Governor Tony Evers through the official website.

Related

Comments

  1. Dick Swanson says

    February 15, 2020 at 9:19 am

    These bills are all about…you and me…the INDUSTRY does not like the idea that we understand what they are doing to our land, water and air…and that they do it on PURPOSE..! Think about this…it takes about 2.5 minutes to fill one semi-tanker with liquid manure…and about 3 minutes to empty one. That tanker has about 5,000-6,000 gallons of shit in it…and all the other chemicals being used on the farm…what comes out of that manure pit is NOT just manure…it is a chemical sludge with who knows what is in it…that’s about 24 TONS per load. I’ve always wondered, with self-reporting from the industry…how accurate are the numbers being reported for the AMOUNT OF THE SPILL…? Lot’s of math…until we know how many gallons of water those High Capacity Wells pump out each year…we will NEVER get the math right..! Why would the industry NOT WANT REAL TIME MONITORING…?

Follow

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter

St. Croix 360 is 100% supported by readers.

Click here to contribute →

 

Latest stories

  • No wakes allowed on lower St. Croix due to high water
  • Snake River Canoe Race sees fast times and smooth paddling
  • Developer proposes 12 new ‘cabins’ on St. Croix River

More news

  • Residents resist St. Croix Falls riverside development proposal
  • Birds, Bugs, and Blooms: A St. Croix 360 spring Saturday
  • Tribal officials applaud plan to change derogatory names for places
  • Stillwater teen drowns in St. Croix River while helping save friend
  • Afton State Park phenology May 13 to 19, 2022
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy

About

St. Croix 360 builds support for river stewardship, and connects people and organizations. It is an independent news source produced by Greg Seitz, with past support from the St. Croix River Association.

Donate to St. Croix 360 today »

Story of 360

One of the biggest challenges facing the St. Croix River is harmful blooms of algae in in the lower river, due to excess nutrients in runoff. The goal is to restore the river by reducing phosphorus levels to 360 tons/year. Learn more »

Share Your News

St. Croix 360 is powered by a broad community of St. Croix River-loving people. Please visit our submission page to send tips, press releases, and other news.

Submit an Event

Lower St. Croix: St. Croix 360 partners with online calendar St. Croix Splash.

  • Submit your events to Splash.
  • Share it with St. Croix 360 for promotion.

For events elsewhere in the watershed, contact St. Croix 360 directly.

St. Croix 360 Syndication

To help increase awareness of the St. Croix River, news organizations and other outlets are free to share St. Croix 360 content, as long as you follow a few simple rules.

Republish St. Croix 360 stories »

Partners

  • St. Croix River Association
  • St. Croix Watershed Research Station
  • ArtReach St. Croix
  • You and all St. Croix 360's readers!
Handcrafted in May Township, Minnesota. Please contribute today »
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
 

Loading Comments...