Via the St. Croix Crossing project website:
View of Pier 12, closest to Wisc. land. Tug boats are breaking ice within the bridge construction zone and downstream near Bayport to keep the waterway open. Crews can only access Piers 10 and 11 in the middle of the river by boat. Tower construction continues at these pier locations. (Photo from Dec. 22, via St. Croix Crossing Facebook page)
A tug boat is breaking ice in the St. Croix River to allow construction crews to continue work on the new St. Croix Crossing during the winter months.
Currently, crews are breaking ice within and downstream of the bridge construction zone – as far south as the overhead power lines coming from the Xcel Energy Allen S. King Power Plant near Bayport, Minn. With the warm water from the power plant this effort helps prevent ice from building up near the bridge construction site by creating a channel for it to disperse and flow downstream.
This activity can cause thin, irregular and dangerous ice conditions on the river. The project is asking snowmobilers and other outdoor recreationalists to use extreme caution on the river between Stillwater and Bayport and to stay away from the construction area. Thin ice signage has been placed at area public boat launches. Additional signage will be posted on the river once the ice thickens.
The contractor, Lunda Ames Joint Venture, will continue to break ice on the river near just north of Bayport until it becomes too thick to manage. However, crews plan to regularly break ice within the bridge construction zone throughout winter 2015-16. Crews will be working at Piers 10 and 11 in the middle of the river. Thus, they need to keep the majority of the waterway open to access these pier locations by boat.
When the St. Croix Crossing project is finished, motorists will have smoother highway pavement surfaces, improved flow at intersections, an improved frontage road system—including safer access—and a new river crossing between Minnesota and Wisconsin. All of this will occur while maintaining or restoring the area’s cultural, historic and environmental resources.
This story provides new and interesting information. The last sentence, however, is pure DOT propaganda.
I agree with. Dana Jackson’s comment. I fail to see how this massive new bridge can be said to be “restoring” or “maintaining” any cultural, historic, or environmental resources that I am aware of. In fact, just the opposite is occurring before our very eyes. It’s pure DOT propaganda indeed!