St. Croix 360

River stories to inspire stewardship.

  • Share News
  • Event Calendar
  • About
    • Contact
    • Subscribe
  • Support

Developer proposes 12 new ‘cabins’ on St. Croix River

St. Croix Falls proposal would sell city land for construction of second homes.

By Greg Seitz | May 6, 2022 | 3 minute read

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Print
  • More
  • LinkedIn
  • Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • Telegram
This view from Minnesota shows part of the shoreline where the development would be built, along the visible river bank on the right side of the photo. (Greg Seitz/St. Croix 360)

A Stillwater company is proposing to build 12 new houses along a stretch of the St. Croix River north of the St. Croix Falls hydroelectric dam, working with the city, which owns the land. Several local citizens object to the plan after details were shared at a March 31 public meeting. Another discussion is planned at the city’s Plan Commission’s meeting on May 16.

The city of St. Croix Falls purchased the land from Xcel Energy about 20 years ago. Officials have now signed an agreement to sell it to GreenHalo Builds, a developer based in Stillwater. The sale is contingent on approval by the city and other agencies.

“Tucked away on a stretch of exquisite St. Croix riverfront, GreenHalo’s EcoRiver is meant as a secluded haven of second homes built with sustainability in mind,” the company says. “This cabin EcoVillage of 12 homesites features modern Scandinavian design and feel with one-level living options and innovative eco-friendly, net-zero ready custom designs. All home-sites offer 50 feet of rivershore with individual dock options on 9 miles of chartered serene, personal watercraft-free St. Croix.”

GreenHalo is hoping to build a total of 12 cabins or second homes on the site. GreenHalo says it is focused on sustainability, with its houses being more energy efficient than average. Calling the proposed new development “EcoRiver,” the builders promise it will be “built with sustainability in mind,” featuring “innovative eco-friendly, net-zero ready custom designs.” There have been no details yet on how it might reduce impacts on the Wild and Scenic St. Croix River.

The legality and ability to get the proposal approved has also been questioned, although St. Croix Falls says they believe it complies with the law. Because the land is located within an incorporated municipality, development restrictions are different than other parts of the river. But questions have already come up about scenic easements and other possible deed restrictions.

“Our understanding is it’s possible to build on there, but we have to wait for that determination to come in,” city administrator Joel West said at the March 31 meeting. “The development needs to go through the full approval process, get comments from the DNR and the federal government, in addition to approval from city council.”

West also said, based on discussions with the developer, homes might be priced about $500,000. St. Croix 360 contacted GreenHalo for comment and received information already publicly available.

  • Examples of GreenHalo home models
Map of development courtesy GreenHalo Builds

Residents at the meeting had many questions and concerns. The lots would be located along a forested stretch of river bank currently owned by the public. New structures would blemish a beautiful river. The surface would switch from soil and native vegetation to asphalt and grass. It would encroach on a quiet area currently occupied by a mobile home community and small marina. New roads would be built, and new outdoor lighting could be added.

The March 31 meeting attendees was “the first step in 50-step process,” administrator West said. “Nothing is written in stone here.”

He pledged that he and other city staff were taking notes and would convey community concerns to the city council. The proposal is also on the agenda for the city’s Plan Commission meeting on May 16. The meeting is scheduled from 7 to 9 p.m. at St. Croix Falls City Hall, 710 Hwy 35, St. Croix Falls, WI.

Related

Comments

  1. Carol says

    May 6, 2022 at 11:47 am

    Are there no restrictions on the size of shoreline footage that is REQUIRED for any dwelling to be built. Zoning restrictions often require a strict minimum; e.g., 100 ft per building? This sounds like a terrible mis-use of what appears to be ‘public’ shoreland property along a wild, scenic protected riverway.

    Reply
    • Lisa Jensen says

      May 8, 2022 at 9:20 am

      Please come help us save our neighborhood. May 16th, 7-9. St. Croix Falls City Government bldg or Face book live. You can commen during the public comments at the beginning of the meeting.

      Reply
  2. Lois Brink says

    May 6, 2022 at 12:42 pm

    Nothing private should be put on that land. It should be for public use only!

    Reply
  3. Nancy says

    May 6, 2022 at 1:31 pm

    I’m not looking forward to the light pollution from the homes and street lights. If this does go through, it is very unfortunate for the river ecosystem.

    Reply
  4. Richard says

    May 6, 2022 at 2:29 pm

    Shame on you for CONSIDERING this!!!

    Reply
  5. Jeff D Peterson says

    May 6, 2022 at 4:41 pm

    How about 50-foot lots from Solon Springs to Prescot! Why think small. All the hillbilly councils along the river will more than likely hand out tax “incentives” to all of the downtrodden developers that show up at their door. Why think small. May as well hand out permits to a couple of hog farms, and more than a few cattle operations along the St. Croix. Why think small. A nuclear or even a coal burner electric plant to power all of the fifty foot lots outdoor lighting would look great somewhere between Marine and Osceola. Fritz Mondale is rolling over in his grave…

    Reply
    • Val says

      May 7, 2022 at 9:00 am

      🙂

      Reply
  6. Luann Kleppe says

    May 6, 2022 at 10:01 pm

    I have walked every foot of that land proposed to be developed, as I formally lived in community there. It is precious native habitat for multiple non-human animals that make it their home and habitat. Many native plants, shrubs and trees. These “eco-homes” are an outrageous slaughter to the land and river…so rich consumers can have their “second homes” and disrupt the native eco system there. Where is the “eco” in all that? Sounds like the community there will have to endure years of loud noises in the slaughter as well. Do I hear AirBnb frequent rentals too? The Wild and Scenic Riverway was dedicated to preserve…not develop the river and riverfront. A vote for this development is a vote that destroys the heart.

    Reply
  7. Valoree says

    May 7, 2022 at 9:02 am

    What about the Wild and Scenic Riverway designation? Did that law anticipate shoreline homes, let alone second homes?

    Reply
  8. Glen Nelson says

    May 7, 2022 at 9:48 am

    Provides avenues for runoff, replacing the buffer zone that is currently provided between humanity and the river. The encroachment of of the river purportedly to give people who can afford ” Scenic river cabin 2nd homes” to display their opulence while blocking the view for the general populace. The absurd “eco river and green halo” labeling should trigger anyone to recognize the development is an afront to the spirit, or ecological well being of the area.

    Reply
  9. KEITH SMITH says

    May 7, 2022 at 11:47 am

    Any one paying 500,000 is going to want a view of the river that means almost clear cutting all the trees x 12 houses = one big swatch gone forever , this can not happen say NO! its all about money NOT ECO!!!!!!!!!

    Reply
  10. Oliver Bigelow says

    May 7, 2022 at 1:45 pm

    I have taken my daughter to the national park service building there almost yearly! When she was only 4 she went on a scavenger hunt to find certain things in this area and became a “park ranger” here. I still have pictures of her smile after she achieved it! Such a disgusting shame that city council would even consider this, none of your community wants this! No tourists want this! Every year I take her through this walkway and see countless other people walking their dogs etc. disgusting abuse of city council power.

    Reply
  11. Mike Buck says

    May 7, 2022 at 2:33 pm

    I’m a disabled person and enjoy kayaking on the river we’re you building these homes is I launch them along with my wife for years people tried to put a dock down there and the city stopped it now your letting 12 homes with docks? My question is are they going to put a dock or something in so can enjoy time also on the river you know that you can’t cross there Land GOD NO so your going to take a disabled person’s enjoyment of having access to fun and making the load it up drive to ramp launch it reload ir drive back home thus is BS

    Reply
    • Sc0tty says

      May 8, 2022 at 5:44 pm

      Damn straight whatever happened to the National Wildlife Rivers right next to the shore that’s just what we need a bunch of bulshit leave that land alone should run up a hundred feet from the river all the way National Scenic River way

      Reply
  12. Paul Jensen says

    May 8, 2022 at 9:10 am

    Natural Scenic Riverway. Breeding grounds. Walter Mondale would cringe at the thought. Financial gains ARE in question here. The public are questioning here and i see “Check yourself because you are wrecking yourself”. The eye shed will be compromised significantly. The public will walk the nature walk to see What? This? Alas all i have to this is my vote is one big “NO THANK YOU”.

    Reply
  13. Deah says

    May 9, 2022 at 5:50 pm

    EVERYone GET to those MEETINGS! Being heard does make a difference. Across the river, Shafer stopped a 12 house development close but not quite on the park this year. This stuff needs people to fight for it.

    Reply
  14. Andy says

    May 9, 2022 at 7:14 pm

    Isn’t this almost exactly what previous Gov Scott Walker wanted by allowing one time short business profits over public enjoyment and nature resilience for the next 100+ years.

    I smell a very few eying long term Airbnb profits while the community will suffer from our of town party seekers forever.

    Reply
    • Jessica Huntington says

      May 10, 2022 at 5:51 pm

      Yep, this has Airbnb written all over it.

      Reply
  15. Michael J Kaiser says

    May 10, 2022 at 5:50 pm

    Somebody is getting ” Kick Backs “

    Reply
  16. Chris P. B. says

    May 10, 2022 at 10:01 pm

    This Eco community sounds awesome! Such a great option got this community.

    Reply

Comment Cancel reply

Follow

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter

St. Croix 360 is 100% supported by readers.

Click here to contribute →

 

Latest stories

  • Tribal officials applaud plan to change derogatory names for places
  • Snake River Canoe Race sees fast times and smooth paddling
  • Developer proposes 12 new ‘cabins’ on St. Croix River

More news

  • No wakes allowed on lower St. Croix due to high water
  • Stillwater teen drowns in St. Croix River while helping save friend
  • Afton State Park phenology May 13 to 19, 2022
  • Anglers can prevent the spread of aquatic invasive species
  • Superfund site in St. Croix region one of first to get Infrastructure Bill funding
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy

About

St. Croix 360 builds support for river stewardship, and connects people and organizations. It is an independent news source produced by Greg Seitz, with past support from the St. Croix River Association.

Donate to St. Croix 360 today »

Story of 360

One of the biggest challenges facing the St. Croix River is harmful blooms of algae in in the lower river, due to excess nutrients in runoff. The goal is to restore the river by reducing phosphorus levels to 360 tons/year. Learn more »

Share Your News

St. Croix 360 is powered by a broad community of St. Croix River-loving people. Please visit our submission page to send tips, press releases, and other news.

Submit an Event

Lower St. Croix: St. Croix 360 partners with online calendar St. Croix Splash.

  • Submit your events to Splash.
  • Share it with St. Croix 360 for promotion.

For events elsewhere in the watershed, contact St. Croix 360 directly.

St. Croix 360 Syndication

To help increase awareness of the St. Croix River, news organizations and other outlets are free to share St. Croix 360 content, as long as you follow a few simple rules.

Republish St. Croix 360 stories »

Partners

  • St. Croix River Association
  • St. Croix Watershed Research Station
  • ArtReach St. Croix
  • You and all St. Croix 360's readers!
Handcrafted in May Township, Minnesota. Please contribute today »
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
 

Loading Comments...