Originally published by the National Park Service:
In 2017, I undertook a project to document the fossils of St. Croix National Scenic Riverway (SACN). This park follows the St. Croix River and its tributary, the Namekagon River, from northwestern Wisconsin to the confluence of the St. Croix with the Mississippi River.
Most of the fossiliferous rocks are found in a portion of the park from the Dalles of the St. Croix to the confluence, near Hastings, Minnesota. Beyond this, above the Dalles, the bedrock is almost entirely composed of Precambrian igneous rocks, which are infrequently exposed because of thick glacial deposits.
Although Minnesota and Wisconsin are not known for their tectonic activity, and are famous for their winter cold, the St. Croix Valley is within a failed 1.1-billion-year-old continental rift, and its sedimentary rocks were deposited in a shallow tropical continental sea when North America was near the equator. These sedimentary rocks were deposited from the Cambrian into the Ordovician, beginning about 500 million years ago.
The youngest rocks within SACN are approximately 455 million years old, but they are very rare. Almost all of the rocks exposed within SACN had been deposited by 470 million years ago, in the Early Ordovician, and of these most had been deposited by 490 million years ago, before the end of the Cambrian. The Cambrian rocks are primarily sandstones, with some siltstones and shales between them. The Lower Ordovician rocks are primarily composed of dolomite, altered from the original limestone.
The geology of the St. Croix region was first documented by surveying expeditions conducted by David Dale Owen during the late 1840s. They made the first reports of fossils from the St. Croix Valley, and recognized them as perhaps the oldest fossils then known. They were followed by James Hall, one of the founding North American paleontologists. He described a number of trilobite species from the valley. Hall’s assistants and protégés continued to collect and describe fossils from the valley for decades, some for the Wisconsin Geological Survey, other fossils for the U.S. Geological Survey/Smithsonian Institution. Perhaps the most notable among these was Charles Walcott of the USGS and Smithsonian; he is better known for his work in the Burgess Shale, but his interest in the Cambrian led him to amass a significant collection from sites now within SACN.
The names used for the formations and fossils became extremely complicated by the middle of the 20th century, and a series of graduate students from the University of Minnesota conducted research projects to disentangle the problems.
The late Cambrian was a sort of “lull” in the history of life. Many of the organisms that had appeared during the Cambrian Explosion had gone extinct, and the next burst of diversification would not take place until the Ordovician. Occasional episodes of low oxygenation of the seas or unusually cold conditions have been suggested as possible causes for the relatively low diversity. The Cambrian fossils of SACN are dominated by brachiopods, snails and snail-like mollusks, trilobites, graptolites, conodonts, and the burrows and trails of unknown worm-like soft-bodied animals.
Brachiopods are shelled filter-feeding marine animals, something like clams, that are still around today. SACN brachiopods are mostly smaller than an inch and often have glossy shells with visible growth bands. The snails and snail-like mollusks that lived alongside them are known mostly from natural molds and casts of their shells, left behind when the original shell material was lost. A site just outside of SACN is famous in geological circles for its fossils of snail-like mollusks and other animals that lived among boulders surrounding an ancient island in the Cambrian sea.
Trilobites are extinct today, but in the Cambrian they were some of the most abundant and diverse animals. These animals shed their exoskeletons to grow, so most of their fossils are not their bodies, but resistant pieces of shed exoskeletons. Many species have been recorded from SACN, and can be used for relative dating of the beds.
Graptolites are an unusual group of colonial animals. They are usually thought to be extinct, but modern pterobranch worms may be living graptolites. Individual graptolite animals lived in cup-like structures in their colonies. The St. Croix graptolites colonies were attached to the seafloor. Many were collected from Afton, but the site was lost to road work.
Conodonts are another extinct group. They were small eel-like animals with large eyes, and were cousins to vertebrates or very early vertebrates themselves. Almost all of their fossils are just their feeding elements, which consist of a variety of microscopic teeth. These are also useful for relative dating. Finally, soft-bodied animals left many burrows and trails in the sand, silt, and shale of the seafloor. Many of these animals will only ever be known by the traces they left, because they lacked hard parts to fossilize.
The Cambrian rocks of SACN have long been a source of notable fossils, documenting a past world that was much different than the present. Where today pine forests and towns overlook the St. Croix River on steep rocky bluffs, a shallow tropical sea populated by shelled animals, crawling trilobites, burrowing worms, and branching colonies of graptolites once existed.
Although body fossils are often uncommon, trace fossils can be seen in many places in SACN. If you see any, remember to leave them be!
Mark Hove says
Fascinating review, thank you!
Justin Tweet says
Lee Lewis says
Great piece. Thanks for doing it. But: SACN means St. Croix Wild & Scenic Riverway. This is a mystery I cannot fathom.
Justin Tweet says
The acronym is from the NPS, which uses four-letter acronyms derived from a park’s name. For instance, Yellowstone National Park, with one word before the type of unit, becomes YELL; Grand Canyon National Park has two words before the type of unit, and becomes GRCA. SACN is a slight exception. It comes from “Saint Croix National” because it can’t use the expected SACR, which was already in use for Saint Croix Island International Historic Site.
Rob McManus says
I’ve been looking for an informative, well written and relatively up to date book on the geology of the St. Croix River and am wondering if you might have a suggestion. Thanks!
Justin Tweet says
I think the closest thing to what you’re looking for may be the Minnesota and Wisconsin “Roadside Geology” books by Mountain Press (the Minnesota book is from 2009, and the Wisconsin book is from 2004).