St. Croix 360

River stories to inspire stewardship.

  • Share News
  • Event Calendar
  • About
    • Contact
    • Subscribe
  • Support

Polk County citizens say proposed factory farm regulations favor industrial agriculture

Community members call on officials to reject ordinances they say aren't strong enough to protect people, land, and water.

By Greg Seitz | June 26, 2020 | 4 minute read

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Print
  • More
  • LinkedIn
  • Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • Telegram
Crossing the St. Croix River and entering Polk County, Wisconsin on Highway 8. (Photo by Royalbroil via Wikipedia)

Efforts to protect land, water, and quality of life in northwest Wisconsin communities from large-scale livestock facilities are coming to a critical point after months of study and discussion. Such Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs) have caused serious pollution and accelerated the disappearance of family farms across the Midwest.

There is intense interest by industrial agriculture in expanding CAFOs from Iowa, where they are prevalent, into parts of the St. Croix River watershed.

Local governments along the river, including counties and rural townships, have been working on the issue as temporary moratoriums block new applications to give officials time to develop rules and regulations.

One such effort has been a study and suggested ordinance proposed in Polk County, which contains St. Croix River tributaries including the Apple, Trade, and Willow Rivers. The county halted any new applications for CAFOs last fall as it studied the issue and worked on regulations.

The ordinance is expected to be voted on by a key committee on July 8.

‘Rolls out the red carpet’

Environmental advocates in the region say the proposed ordinance was crafted by two pro-CAFO county commissioners, and it “rolls out the red carpet for hog factory farm developers.” They are urging their fellow citizens to speak up in opposition.

Criticisms of the ordinance include the fact it would allow hog barns and manure lagoons 200 feet from neighbors, and a quarter-mile from lakes and rivers. There are few other restrictions on operations.

Polk County commissioners heard some feedback to the proposal, and a draft report on the issue by the county’s Environmental Services Committee, at its June 16 meeting.

“Huge hog factories have serious detrimental effects on public health and land,” Laketown resident Vicki Breault told the board. “Once the damage is done, it is difficult if not impossible to reverse.”

Laketown is located north of St. Croix Falls, and it lives up to its name with numerous bodies of water. It is also a key area targeted by CAFO developers, just south of the Burnett County line, where a hog farm that would house up to 26,000 swine has already been proposed.

Breault and other speakers also called a report on the issue conducted by the county’s Environmental Services Committee, which commissioner Brad Olson chairs, inadequate. The report does not include recommendations for ordinances, existing laws and regulations, or many other key pieces of information.

“This report falls far short of reasonable expectation for a six month long study of one of the most controversial and divisive issues this county has faced for decades,” said another speaker, Thomas Scott.

Limited limitations

Map by Greg Seitz, St. Croix 360

Local communities can only regulate CAFOs, and are prohibited by Wisconsin law from banning them altogether. In addition, “right-to-farm” laws limit legal opposition from neighbors. But government units like Polk County can enact ordinances that try to reduce the impact of such facilities.

The two townships at the center of CAFO interest in Polk County are Laketown and Eureka, in the far northwest of the county. Eureka Township adjoins the St. Croix River from about Wolf Creek south to St. Croix Falls.

Farming has been part of the region for centuries, but the livestock industry is rapidly moving toward consolidation, cutting connections to communities and the land, and significantly increasing the risk of pollution. Larger and larger facilities can create greater efficiency and profits, but it also means a lot of manure is located in small areas.

Both townships recently enacted their own CAFO moratoriums, and then passed their own ordinances. Citizens say there needs to be strong county-wide regulation, and enforcement of the rules, if any CAFOs begin operating.

“Although animal manure is an invaluable fertilizer, waste quantities of the magnitude produced by CAFO operations represent a public a health and ecological hazard through the degradation of surface and ground water resources,” Eureka Township’s new ordinance reads.

The town also pointed to the application for a CAFO in neighboring Burnett County, which predicts the operation would produce more than 9 million gallons of manure each year, and spread it all on local farm fields.

Bayfield County in northern Wisconsin enacted a strict ordinance in 2016, and a proposed large-scale livestock facility was halted. That ordinance included requiring CAFOs to have the capacity to store manure for about 18 months rather than the state requirement of six months of manure storage (which would allow for spreading it only when the ground is able to absorb the manure).

Speak up

Public input on Polk County’s proposed ordinance is being accepted in a few ways during the next week. Comments from Polk County citizens are most valuable. Here is a list of ways to weigh in, from advocate Lisa Doerr:

  • Today – Use your phone to record a video message (3-minute limit). Start with your name and town. Then tell them we don’t want the Olson/Nelson ordinance. Email it by July 6 to jason.kjeseth@co.polk.wi.us
  • July 1 – Record a video comment at County Government Center between 2 and 8 p.m.
  • July 8 – Testify to the Environment Services Committee at County Government Center at 10 a.m.

More information

  • Polk County proposed CAFO ordinances
  • Polk County Large-Scale Livestock (Swine) Facility Study Group Report
  • Stop Hog Factories in Polk County
  • Town of Eureka CAFO ordinance (PDF)
  • Bayfield County Confronts Challenges Of Regulating A Potential CAFO – WisContext, July 2016

Related articles:

Comments

  1. Mark Hove says

    July 6, 2020 at 3:41 pm

    Wow, this is so informative, thank you Greg!! There are so few clean rivers left in the US. I want to do what I can to protect the St. Croix River basin.

Follow

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Features

Two inches and 6,000 gallons: A swollen century on the St. Croix River

Cold comfort

New preserve will let students, community, and anglers experience the Kinnickinnic River

St. Croix 360 is now 100% supported by readers.

Click here to contribute →

 

Latest News

Progress reported on effort to establish National Heritage Area for St. Croix River region

Afton State Park Phenology Feb. 19 to March 4, 2021

Spring is coming: Officials provide first St. Croix River flood forecast of season

Tax dollars work for water: Legacy Amendment funds will help protect St. Croix River

Watch: A guy’s goats keep him company while he swims the icy St. Croix

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy

About

St. Croix 360 builds support for river stewardship, and connects people and organizations. It is an independent news source produced by Greg Seitz, with past support from the St. Croix River Association.

Donate to St. Croix 360 today »

Story of 360

One of the biggest challenges facing the St. Croix River is harmful blooms of algae in in the lower river, due to excess nutrients in runoff. The goal is to restore the river by reducing phosphorus levels to 360 tons/year. Learn more »

Share Your News

St. Croix 360 is powered by a broad community of St. Croix River-loving people. Please visit our submission page to send tips, press releases, and other news.

Submit an Event

Lower St. Croix: St. Croix 360 partners with online calendar St. Croix Splash.

  • Submit your events to Splash.
  • Share it with St. Croix 360 for promotion.

For events elsewhere in the watershed, contact St. Croix 360 directly.

St. Croix 360 Syndication

To help increase awareness of the St. Croix River, news organizations and other outlets are free to share St. Croix 360 content, as long as you follow a few simple rules.

Republish St. Croix 360 stories »

Partners

  • St. Croix River Association
  • St. Croix Watershed Research Station
  • ArtReach St. Croix
  • You and all St. Croix 360's readers!
Handcrafted in May Township, Minnesota. Please contribute today »
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.