Sponsored

Minnesota scientists call for a Tamarack region sulfide mining study

Experts say state should study cumulative impacts of potential mining in Mississippi and St. Croix headwaters.

By

/

/

2 minute read

Drill cores from the Tamarack Project. (Talon Corp.)

Retired scientists who worked on the Minnesota Duluth Complex area Copper-Nickel Study in the 1970s have now called for a similar Tamarack Region Sulfide Ore Study of environmental baseline data and likely impacts from sulfide ore mining by Talon Metals and Rio Tinto in central Minnesota.

No Minnesota study has yet researched mining in the Tamarack area, upstream of the wild and scenic St. Croix River, the Mississippi River, and Minnesota’s largest population center. Minnesota rules require an environmental impact statement (EIS) for a new sulfide ore mine project. However, the proposal Talon Metals submitted in June 2023 to start this process only proposed to mine the first 225 acres of more than 31,000 acres of lands and mining leases that Talon controls.

Bruce Johnson, a chemist/biologist who worked for the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and participated in Minnesota’s Copper-Nickel Study in the 1970s emphasized, “Fifty years ago, our State recognized that an EIS for a site-specific project picked by a mining company was inadequate to protect the water, air, lands, and creatures of an entire region. They had it right. Talon Metals’ initial project is one tenth of one percent of its potential mining district. It’s ridiculous that environmental review of that small project would be enough to risk opening up the Mississippi River and St. Croix River watersheds to the most toxic industry in America.”

Fred Campbell, a retired geologist who also worked for the DNR on Minnesota’s 1970s Copper-Nickel study explained, “A Regional Study in the Tamarack area is needed to put the science first. Minnesota should have comprehensive and independent baseline data on regional geology, hydrology, and chemistry so we can understand the risks rather than taking a blind leap of faith into new sulfide ore mining.”

Neither the DNR nor the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board (EQB) have publicly raised the question of whether a Tamarack Region Study should be completed before sulfide ore mining is permitted upstream of the St. Croix River, the Mississippi River and the Minneapolis-St. Paul area.

Paula Maccabee, Advocacy Director and Counsel for WaterLegacy, stated, “Talon Metals and Rio Tinto are sitting on $135 million in federal handouts and planning for district-scale sulfide ore mining in the heart of Minnesota. Minnesota should now choose science––not subsidies––to protect the Tamarack region and our downstream communities from new threats posed by sulfide ore mining.”

The paper calling for a Tamarack Region Sulfide Ore Study of Environmental Baseline Data and Mining Effects can be found here.

Documents related to Talon Metals’ proposed initial mining project can be found on the DNR’s website here.


Comments

St. Croix 360 offers commenting to support productive discussion. We don’t allow name-calling, personal attacks, or misinformation. This discussion may be heavily moderated and we reserve the right to block nonconstructive comments. Please: Be kind, give others the benefit of the doubt, read the article closely, check your assumptions, and stay curious. Thank you!

“Opinion is really the lowest form of human knowledge. It requires no accountability, no understanding.” – Bill Bullard

3 responses to “Minnesota scientists call for a Tamarack region sulfide mining study”

  1. Mark Hove Avatar
    Mark Hove

    Fascinating, and “Yuck!”

  2. Sue Avatar
    Sue

    Don’t we ever learn?

  3. Peter Clevenstine Avatar
    Peter Clevenstine

    Seems like a delay tactic. MN regulators will certainly have more relevant information to consider with a defined project proposal versus a regional study of hypothetical scenarios…