Progress reported on effort to establish National Heritage Area for St. Croix River region

The National Park Service has approved the proposal, and legislation is in the works.

By

/

/

2 minute read

A paddleboat and kayaker on the St. Croix River. (National Park Service)
Heritage Area boundary map (Click to enlarge)

The long process of trying to receive national recognition for the 8,000-square mile St. Croix River watershed has recently moved forward.

Local volunteers have been preparing a proposal for the region for almost 10 years. Mary Divine in the Pioneer Press recently reported on the latest developments:

A renewed push to have the St. Croix River region become a National Heritage Area is underway.

Earlier this month, officials from the National Park Service, which oversees the National Heritage Area program, signed off on the North Woods and Waters of the St. Croix National Heritage Area’s feasibility study after determining that the plan meets all the necessary criteria.

The designation of the North Woods and Waters of the St. Croix National Heritage Area, which still requires congressional approval, would help protect and improve the area’s natural, cultural and historic resources, said Marty Harding, board chairwoman. It also would boost tourism and bring in federal money, she said.

There are currently 55 NHAs nationwide, including Ohio & Erie National Heritage Canal Way in Ohio, the Hudson River Valley in upstate New York, Blue Ridge National Heritage Area in North Carolina and the Kenai Mountains in Alaska. The North Woods and Waters of the St. Croix National Heritage Area would be the first NHA in Minnesota and Wisconsin.

St. Croix River region closer to being named National Heritage Area, Pioneer Press

Rep. Ron Kind of Wisconsin has drafted legislation to designate the St. Croix National Heritage Area, and hopes it will receive a hearing this spring.

The North Woods and Waters of the St. Croix National Heritage Area seeks to celebrate the region’s history and culture, including Native Americans, fur-trading, logging, and natural resource conservation.

“Travel within the Heritage Area provides opportunities to experience small historical communities and reignite your interest in a past where abundant wildlife and white pine forests fueled the fur trade and lumber industry for nearly 300 years – followed by dramatic migrations of people from the Atlantic Coast and immigrants from throughout Europe,” the group says.

National Heritage Areas are managed locally but receive about $300,000 a year from the National Park Service, which must be matched with local funding. They do not include regulations or restrictions to prevent development or protect the environment.

More information:

North Woods and Waters of the St. Croix Heritage Area


Comments

St. Croix 360 offers commenting to support productive discussion. We don’t allow name-calling, personal attacks, or misinformation. This discussion may be heavily moderated and we reserve the right to block nonconstructive comments. Please: Be kind, give others the benefit of the doubt, read the article closely, check your assumptions, and stay curious. Thank you!

“Opinion is really the lowest form of human knowledge. It requires no accountability, no understanding. The highest form of knowledge is empathy, for it requires us to suspend our egos and live in another’s world.” – Bill Bullard

2 responses to “Progress reported on effort to establish National Heritage Area for St. Croix River region”

  1. Mary Austin Avatar
    Mary Austin

    I’m glad the river is moving closer to the national heritage designation, but I am confused at the same time. In one paragraph, it states that the river’s designation “would help protect and improve the area’s natural, cultural and historic resources”, but in the last paragraph it unfortunately states that “they do not include regulations or restrictions to prevent development or protect the environment.” I wish the designation offered more significant protection.

  2. Cam Smith Avatar
    Cam Smith

    Looks like another way to stop any future progress by involving the federal government. Would this be like when something’s declared Historical, and you can’t change anything nearby anymore? Europe had a lot of this, so much historical stuff, buildings, etc, they can’t do much new anymore.