Federal agency requests public feedback on proposal to remove dams on the Kinnickinnic River

Comment period and open house announced for study of costs and benefits of restoring natural flow.

By

/

/

2 minute read

Junction Falls Dam, Kinnickinnic River, River Falls, Wis. (Greg Seitz/St. Croix 360)

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District, is seeking public input on its recently completed draft feasibility study for an environmental restoration project on the Kinnickinnic River in River Falls, Wisconsin.

USACE previously held a public meeting in August 2023 and welcomed comments on the project. The study and environmental assessment outlines the project’s costs and benefits and determines whether it is in the federal government’s interest to pursue it.

There are currently two dams on the Kinnickinnic River in River Falls. The Kinnickinnic River is a class 1 trout stream and the river section along River Falls is highly degraded because of impoundments. The removal of the Junction Falls Dam and Powell Falls Dam present a unique opportunity to restore the river to its natural setting.

Prior to the dams being constructed, the Kinnickinnic River was a free-flowing river with natural waterfalls. Prior to the construction of the dams, the river flowed over the upper part of Junction Falls, dropping roughly 10 feet before flatting out for 100 feet then dropping an additional 16 feet over the lower falls. The impoundments of Lake George and Lake Louise have resulted in increased sedimentation, increased water temperatures, and lack of aquatic diversity, which is consistent with negative ecological impacts associated to dams.

The draft report and environmental assessment describing the study and environmental effects are available to the public and can be viewed and downloaded from the St. Paul District website.

Questions or comments on the report and environmental assessment will be accepted through June 20, 2025, and should be directed to CEMVP_Planning@usace.army.mil. Please address all formal written correspondence on this project to the St. Paul District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Attention: Regional Planning and Environment Division North, 332 Minnesota Street, St. Paul, Minnesota, 55101.

The Corps of Engineers contributes to the environmental sustainability of our nation by protecting the nation’s aquatic resources. We manage the Clean Water Act permitting program for the states of Minnesota and Wisconsin, ensuring that development is accomplished in a sustainable manner.


Comments

St. Croix 360 offers commenting to support productive discussion. We don’t allow name-calling, personal attacks, or misinformation. This discussion may be heavily moderated and we reserve the right to block nonconstructive comments. Please: Be kind, give others the benefit of the doubt, read the article closely, check your assumptions, and stay curious. Thank you!

“Opinion is really the lowest form of human knowledge. It requires no accountability, no understanding.” – Bill Bullard

6 responses to “Federal agency requests public feedback on proposal to remove dams on the Kinnickinnic River”

  1. hukrepus Avatar
    hukrepus

    Highly degraded? I catch more 20+ inch brown trout in Lake George in downtown RF than anywhere else on the Kinni. Not to mention the giant white sucker.

    3
  2. Lois A Brink Avatar
    Lois A Brink

    I support taking them down.

    3
  3. Mark Hove Avatar
    Mark Hove

    Thank you for sharing the contact email. I had trouble finding who to write to.

    1
  4. Jared Hoke Avatar

    Part of the cost of removing these assets will be the loss of the benefits that define their original purpose. I assume these to be flood control and power generation. Don’t we still need power and flood control? Comment?

  5. Alex St Croix Avatar
    Alex St Croix

    What is the long term cost of leaving them as is? What is the long term cost of restoring them to electrical generation? What is the benefit if any to flood control vs the ongoing cost to maintain? What is the cost of removing them vs at least 3 alternative maintenance and preservation costs (electricity generation, flood control, non-removal)… What commercial benefit would occur in restoring the river to pre-dam conditions?

    1. Greg Seitz Avatar
      Greg Seitz

      That’s what the feasibility study covers.

      1

Leave a Reply to Alex St CroixCancel reply